JFK AUTOPSY PHOTOS :THE BACK WOUND (warning graphic images )

[fobrien1]

above is jfks back , from the photo jfk appears to have been on his stomach on the autopsy table . this photo also shows the lower and upper of the back of the head .

please note the hands on jfks body , there are three . two of them are on jfks back , you will note that the lower hand is a left hand , and the upper hand is a right , that means that two different people are holding the ruler .

jfks head is for want of a better term pushing backwards SEE THE WRINKLES ON HIS NECK , that gives the impression that the hairline ( WHERE THE HAIR MEETS THE BACK OF THE NECK ) is closer to the back wound than it actually was .

the area just right of where the wrinkles can be seen on the neck is the area where the official version of events tells you that jfk had an entry wound . as you can see THAT IS A LIE , there is no wound there .



above are the rydberg drawings for the warren commission and where the warren commission said the bullets hit jfk , still to this day if you watch any new or recent jfk documentary odds are its an oswald did it alone documentary and odds are extremely high that they will show a bullet entering high on the right side of the neck . the middle of the 3 rydberg drawings shows the same thing A WOUND ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE NECK THAT WAS NEVER THERE .



as you can see above from just back in late 2013 pbs america was STILL telling the american people that jfk had a bullet entry on the right of his neck , and they show a bullet entering about the level of the top of the white shirt collar . you can see from the above autopsy photo that there was NO WOUND in that area . the wound was on the BACK several inches below where it was OFFICIALLY and falsely placed . all american media places the entry wound on the neck , why ? because its the OFFICIAL version of events and rarely if ever do they stray from that .

now if you go back to the autopsy photo above and look at jfks back just to the right of the top of the ruler , close to the top of the ruler and to the right of it is a blemish that appears to be a bullet entry wound . now before i go further please note that the top of the ruler is pressed tight into the flesh of the neck , that is because its pressed up against one of the vertebra of the neck. to measure as precisely as they can they use a particular part of the body ,a part of the body that is rigid (does not move ) and that allows pretty accurate measurement . so for example they could put the ruler at say c3 (third cervical vertebra ) and find that the wound was say 3 inches (or 9 cm ) precisely below that point . that gives a reasonably accurate measurement . officially in this case the pathologists used the mastoid , a bump of bone on the skull at about the level of the middle of the ear (either side of the head) . so they said they placed the top of the ruler by that bump on the skull and measured down to where the entry wound was and they got their measurement . ANYONE SEE THE PROBLEM THERE ? , well the wrinkles on jfks neck in the autopsy photo should be an indication . the head is not rigid , it moves up / down and left /right as the wrinkles prove . the wrinkles indicate that the head is being pushed or is leaning backwards , that puts the mastoid closer to the wound than it actually was if the head was perfectly upright and rigid . it may only be a difference of a cm or two but a half inch give or take is a lot in determining exactly where a wound REALLY was .

in the autopsy photo above one thing seems clear , and that is that the ruler is pressed against the bottom of a cervical vertebra , maybe c3 (actually judging by the wrinkles on the neck probably nearer to c4) and they are then measuring down from that .from the top down  there are 7  cervical vertebra and after that 12 thoracic vertebra . now according to VERIFIED autopsy face sheet signed and marked verified (by admiral (dr ) burkley jfks personal physician ) the wound was located at about the level of the third thoracic vertebra or t3 , its hard to view that as PRECISE  as it says a about the level , but that was according to burkley verifed as being the general location . lets say it was a tad higher at t2 , t2 being the second thoracic vertebra . now if  the the ruler mentioned above is at the bottom of c3 that means there are 4 more cervical vertebra below that , and a further two thoracic vertebra if the wound was at t2 , so thats 5 vertebra , or 4 if we say the ruler was pressed against c4 .

now have a look where c4 (the fourth cervical vertebra is )  and also where T2 (second thoracic vertebra is located .



as you can see T2 is quite a distance down from the right of the neck , but then the autopsy photo above proves beyond ANY DOUBT that there never was a wound any where on the neck .

lets go back to the blemish i mentioned above that is to the right of the top of the ruler , looks like a bullet wound doesnt it ? . well firstly its too big , the bullets fired were only 6.5 mm , it looks atleast a centimeter high and wide . in fact that blemish if it is a wound measures in at 15x8 mm . bullet entry points for the most part (obviously excluding shot gun blasts or frangible bullets or similar ) are smaller then the exit point , and in fact a bullet entry can be smaller than the bullet , after all skin / flesh will stretch and then return back to its normal or near to normal position. so the entry wound should be 6.5mm or smaller . it should be noted also that the back wound was recorded as being at an entry angle of about 10 or 11 degrees , the angle from the 6th floor window was double that at 20 to 21 degrees . as with most aspects of this case THE OFFICIAL MATH DOESNT WORK . in case what this means is not clear , it means that for jfk to have an entry wound on his back of about a 10 degree angle that the bullet MUST be fired from an area several floors below the 6th floor . but instead of being honest and engaging in an honest investigation to get the truth the warren commission decided IT WAS EASIER (for the lone nut conclusion they had already decided would be the case ) TO JUST MOVE THE ENTRY WOUND UP TO THE NECK . and lets be clear here THERE WAS NO ERROR , the pathologists SAW JFKS WOUNDS AT FIRST HAND , earl warren , j lee rankin and arlen specter atleast saw the autopsy photo THAT I POSTED ABOVE as they admitted it , so they knew what they said WAS A LIE .

i need to finish this post now as i had not planned to post in depth here . but i just want to go back on last time to the autopsy photo with the top of the ruler pressed against a cervical vertebra . now look at the two hands from two different people that are on the ruler , WHERE DO THEY INDICATE THAT THE WOUND IS ? . NO NOT THE TOP RIGHT OF THE RULER , in  my humble opinion if you look at the third finger of the top hand and also look at the third finger of the bottom hand and then look in the area between the two and to the right of that . the autopsy photo above is enlarged and shows that area well ANYONE THINK THAT WAS THE REAL ENTRY WOUND ? . its about the right size and it has an abrasion collar . maybe the following pictures will answer the question .



above is jfks jacket and shirt both showing the bullet hole . now we have to allow for a man to be inside these items of clothing , that will move the hole slightly up . allowing for that WHERE WAS THE REAL ENTRY WOUND LOCATION ? . anyone here STILL think the tv shows and the warren report saying the wound was on the right of jfks neck IS TRUE AND ACCURATE ? .